Our Waterfront, Our VoteVote No on Measure X

Join your neighborsto defeat Measure X

Donateto defeat Measure X

Measure X Gives Developers More Building Rights—and Sausalito the Bill

More building rights. No flood-protection project. No funding plan.

Measure X is promoted as a way to pay for sea-level rise. Its text does something very different: it authorizes much larger commercial buildings on flood-exposed shoreline land, provides no flood-protection project or funding plan, and repeals the rule requiring developers to pay their share of infrastructure costs.

Developers receive more valuable building rights. Sausalito could be left with the buildings, infrastructure, risk, and public costs.

Building more in harm’s way is not a flood plan.

Sausalito’s shoreline faces sea-level rise, storm surge, groundwater flooding, subsidence, and aging infrastructure. Measure X applies its extreme upzoning to Waterfront parcels from near the Spinnaker through the Marinship and toward the north end of town—including some of Sausalito’s lowest, most flood-exposed land.

Large new fixed buildings would add more private property, utilities, roads, and access needs in places already at risk. As the water rises, the City could face increasing pressure to protect those investments.

Measure X contains no flood project and no money to build one.

Measure X contains:

  • No project: no road, drainage, flood-control, or shoreline improvement it would actually build
  • No cost estimate: no calculation of what the necessary work would cost
  • No dedicated funding: no dedicated revenue or financing district
  • No requirement that new development fund shoreline protection

New development may generate some additional tax revenue. But Measure X’s proponents have presented no analysis showing how much, when it would arrive, or whether it would come close to paying for roads, drainage, and shoreline protection. Measure X dedicates none of it to those needs.

City staff concluded that indirect revenue alone is unlikely—particularly in the early years—to support new and existing infrastructure. A possible future assessment or special tax would require a separate property-owner approval process. Measure X creates neither.

Measure X repeals the rule that makes development pay its share.

Current law requires developer contributions when more development is allowed. The Marinship Specific Plan also assigns responsibility for certain street and intersection improvements to the properties that benefit.

Measure X repeals those provisions. City staff reports that Sausalito has no replacement impact fees for roads, storm drainage, or shoreline protection.

The independent review found that many Marinship buildings are reached through confusing private roads that are sometimes not maintained and likely cannot support significant new development. More building rights do not repair that private infrastructure—or make deferred maintenance on private property a citywide taxpayer obligation.

New projects and the properties that benefit should pay for the roads, drainage, utilities, access, and other improvements they require. Yet Measure X grants the increased building rights first and repeals the principal tool tying private redevelopment to infrastructure contributions.

Owners can move on. Sausalito lives with what gets built.

New waterfront buildings may change owners many times. But the buildings, roads, utilities, emergency-access needs, and pressure for shoreline protection remain in Sausalito.

Measure X increases the private value placed in harm’s way without establishing who will pay to protect it. That is how a private development opportunity can become a public expense.

The Better Way: Build on suitable land. Make development pay its share.

Finish the shoreline plan before rezoning vulnerable land. Decide what should be protected, raised, restored, floated, adapted, or left open. Identify parcels that are actually suitable for new buildings, then adopt development rules that fit those places.

Require every new project to pay its fair share of the infrastructure and adaptation it needs. Do not upzone our most vulnerable parcels in the hope that future development will somehow pay to protect itself.

Sources